← Search

ALVA BRANDON

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
283 matches · 158W–125L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
47 of 129
NV · 4.0
69 of 203

ALVA is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

ALVA has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, ALVA has gone from the 15th to the 68th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 68.2% of games
3.5
65.4%
68W–36L · 54.7% of games
4.0
39.6%
38W–58L · 46.5% of games
4.5
0%
0W–12L · 33.2% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 69.3% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.6% of games
6.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history283 matches
W
N/A
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marisela Cruz
−0.080about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Grob
−0.044below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Pilar Grimes / Aime Claire Lager
2026-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Grob
+0.009about as expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
−0.020below expectation — took 57% of games against 63% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
+0.015better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kayla Blum
−0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Debbie Barbaroussis-Goot / Nora Taylor
2026-03-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jen Liong
+0.054better than expected — took 71% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Jones
+0.040better than expected — took 32% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-02-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Jones
+0.069better than expected — took 62% of games against 35% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-02-09 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Castelli
−0.008about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
Maria Gonzales / Sonia Vermeys
2026-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Jones
+0.035better than expected — took 37% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-12-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabine Curtis
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.