← Search

Jonna Gilmore

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
312 matches · 215W–97L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
25 of 129
NV · 4.0
38 of 203

Jonna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jonna has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jonna has gone from the 75th to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level10 levels played
2.5
50%
10W–10L · 54.5% of games
3.0
80.9%
38W–9L · 62.1% of games
3.5
77.8%
42W–12L · 59.6% of games
4.0
71%
93W–38L · 58.6% of games
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.3% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.9% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history312 matches
L
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · with Kayla Blum
−0.016below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Anahi Sanchez
+0.010better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Madison Foley / Philip Tompkinsmixed
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ianmarco Millet
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Bosnos
−0.030below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Esther Tan / Janet Wellman
2026-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Bosnos
+0.052better than expected — took 92% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Alexander Klupchak / Nicole Medasmixed
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Larry Gilmore
+0.000below expectation — took 56% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josephine McPeak
+0.025better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Bosnos
+0.044better than expected — took 63% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josephine McPeak
−0.006about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Amy Pan / Aime Claire Lager
2026-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candy Rosenberg
−0.041below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Daniel Armellino / Audrey Chinmixed
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ianmarco Millet
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 32% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Esther Tan / Sophy Feng
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candy Rosenberg
−0.050below expectation — took 38% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.