← Search

Josephine McPeak

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
417 matches · 239W–178L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Josephine McPeak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history417 matches
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Sheri Grossberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Anahi Sanchez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · with Kayla Blum championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheri Grossberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aleksei Zilberman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-02 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonna Gilmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-27 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kayla Blum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aleksei Zilberman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
80.6%
25W–6L · 66.4% of games
3.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 65.9% of games
3.5
71.4%
40W–16L · 60.5% of games
4.0
54.5%
114W–95L · 52.6% of games
4.5
24.2%
8W–25L · 42.1% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 78.9% of games
6.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.1% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 31.1% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
172 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
124 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
74 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
16 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe