← Search

Amy Levasseur

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
589 matches · 311W–278L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Levasseur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history589 matches
L
2026-08-10 · CANYON GATE · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Zommick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · CANYON GATE · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · CANYON GATE · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Maier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Soong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Soong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-02 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamaica Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-27 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamaica Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-02-23 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Soong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
60.5%
75W–49L · 54.4% of games
3.5
59.3%
108W–74L · 53.9% of games
4.0
38.9%
63W–99L · 45.5% of games
7.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 58% of games
8.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.7% of games
6.5mixed
40%
6W–9L · 46.1% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 49.6% of games
7.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
191 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
180 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
133 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
44 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
13 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams