← Search

Amy Levasseur

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
588 matches · 311W–277L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
56%
down to 3.5
44%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 34% down · 66% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.53. Higher than today’s 3.49 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
116 of 129
NV · 4.0
178 of 203

Amy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amy has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Amy has gone from the 26th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level11 levels played
3.0
60.5%
75W–49L · 54.4% of games
3.5
58.6%
95W–67L · 54.1% of games
4.0
40.2%
68W–101L · 45.8% of games
4.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 52.8% of games
7.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 58% of games
8.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.7% of games
6.5mixed
40%
6W–9L · 46.1% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 49.6% of games
7.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history588 matches
W
Diane Welch / Amy Nhaisi
2026-07-13 · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Richards
−0.011below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Amanda Gumberg / Mimi Liu
2026-07-06 · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Dyer
+0.016better than expected — took 63% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Alexandra Song / Elyzabeth Pham
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Maier
+0.031better than expected — took 45% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jennifer Peterson / Jenny Penesa
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Soong
+0.007about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Esther Tan / Sonia Vermeys
2026-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Soong
−0.002about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
Barbara Fair / Diane Welch
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Richards
−0.006about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Mary Stephenson / Travis Azous
2026-05-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Hale
+0.018better than expected — took 43% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamaica Tan
−0.025below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Hale
−0.014below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamaica Tan
+0.026better than expected — took 46% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-02-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Soong
−0.052below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Suzette LaGrange-Miranda / Samantha Schwartz
2026-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Richards
−0.030below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.