← Search

Elyzabeth Pham

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 152W–37L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Elyzabeth Pham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history189 matches
W
2026-08-29 · OC Monarch Butterflies - Elyz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ayako Hasegawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-28 · OC Monarch Butterflies - Elyz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Huma Khan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
Ann Pham / Huong Nardelli
2026-08-10 · DTC · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Witherspoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · OC Monarch Butterflies - Elyz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huma Khan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-30 · DTC #4 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Song
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · with Susie Park championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Witherspoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · DTC #4 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tami Vannah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-04-20 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Desiree Kathmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · OC LLW Classy on the Court - LPC - Mak - Sun9 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · DTC #4 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-06 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Vannah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 65.9% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
94.7%
18W–1L · 67.1% of games
4.0
76.7%
46W–14L · 60% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 67.8% of games
7.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 69% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 58% of games
8.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe