Search

Elyzabeth Pham

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
185 matches · 150W–35L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
28 of 129
NV · 4.0
41 of 203

Elyzabeth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elyzabeth has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Elyzabeth has gone from the 96th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level11 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 65.9% of games
3.5
100%
17W–0L · 68.8% of games
4.0
77.6%
45W–13L · 60.4% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 67.8% of games
7.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 77.2% of games
8.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 56.3% of games
8.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.9% of games
9.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 73.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history185 matches
W
Kelly Maier / Amy Levasseur
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Song
0.031below expectation — took 55% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Stacey Iwata / Lorene Millerchamps
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · with Susie Park
+0.069better than expected — took 86% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Witherspoon
+0.018better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lori LaBarbera / Jaclyn O'Malley
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tami Vannah
0.015about as expected — took 72% of games against 70% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-04-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Desiree Kathmann
0.008below expectation — took 44% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
Michelle Haghani / Carrie Anderson
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Park
+0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 2-5, 1-0
W
Margret Winter
2026-04-18 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.044better than expected — took 60% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Jan Willis / Valerie Murphy
2026-04-06 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Vannah
0.040below expectation — took 57% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Romi Archer / Katherine Sexton
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Park
0.008below expectation — took 47% of games against 52% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Kristen Petrovacki
2026-03-15 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.058below expectation — took 25% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ayako Hasegawa
0.005about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda
+0.012better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.