← Search

Catherine Vannah

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
342 matches · 198W–144L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.52
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
41%
down to 3.5
59%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 24% down · 76% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.56. Higher than today’s 3.52 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
110 of 129
NV · 4.0
167 of 203

Catherine is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Catherine has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Catherine has gone from the 27th to the 37th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
73.8%
90W–32L · 57.7% of games
4.0
42.6%
60W–81L · 49.1% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.2% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 49.3% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history342 matches
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyree Judd
−0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tami Vannah
+0.019better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyree Judd
−0.003below expectation — took 14% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Jan Willis / Valerie Murphy
2026-04-06 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elyzabeth Pham
−0.040below expectation — took 57% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tami Vannah
−0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mimi Liu
−0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Diane Welch / Amy Nhaisi
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyree Judd
−0.018below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Terri Andrews / Karin de Amicis
2026-02-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tharika Irvin
+0.038better than expected — took 62% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Stephanie Ward / Jenny Penesa
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Peterson
+0.020better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyree Judd
+0.024better than expected — took 48% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Barbara Fair / Denise Mandelbaum
2026-02-05 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elyzabeth Pham
+0.043better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Sandra Zanella / Rosemary Turner
2026-01-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tami Vannah
−0.004below expectation — took 28% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.