← Search

Lisa Chudd

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 70W–64L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lisa Chudd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Penesa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rozanne Meservey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcy Saxe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheri Feast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2002–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 59.2% of games
4.0
51%
50W–48L · 49.6% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 58.2% of games
8.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King