Search

Lisa Chudd

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
134 matches · 70W–64L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
54%
stay 3.5
46%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 86% stay · 14% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.41. Lower than today’s 3.49 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
20 of 139
NV · 3.5
23 of 228

Lisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams46 teams · 2002–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Lisa has gone from the 59th to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 59.2% of games
4.0
51%
50W–48L · 49.6% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 58.2% of games
8.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history134 matches
W
Debbie Hicks / Joni Kerby
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Sanders
+0.036better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Penesa
0.001below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Dawn Anderson / Shelby McIntyre
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Sanders
+0.012better than expected — took 55% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Sanders
+0.002about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Sanders
0.074below expectation — took 20% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Sanders
0.039below expectation — took 50% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Karen Kiyono / Karen Miller
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Sanders
+0.025better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Cynthia Graham / Cynthia Turner
2026-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rozanne Meservey
+0.016better than expected — took 45% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Mandy Hansen / Carrie Whipple
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Sanders
0.020below expectation — took 47% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Diane Welch / Amy Nhaisi
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth McManus
+0.002about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcy Saxe
0.019below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Nancy Holland / Kelly Kedge
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheri Feast
0.050below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.