Search

Jane Dorn

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
89 matches · 51W–38L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
61 of 129
NV · 4.0
85 of 203

Jane is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jane has been a steady 4.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jane has gone from the 43rd to the 98th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
55.3%
42W–34L · 52.1% of games
8.0
70%
7W–3L · 58.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dorothea Cheng
+0.001better than expected — took 86% of games against 73% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dorothea Cheng
+0.015better than expected — took 92% of games against 72% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Lisa Ross / Christi Lin
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Golden
+0.012better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Jennifer Gleason / Maria Gonzales
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dorothea Cheng
0.023about as expected — took 71% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Karen Watts / Susan Castelli
2026-04-20 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Dyer
0.006about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debora Dean
+0.018better than expected — took 60% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dorothea Cheng
+0.032better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Billi Dunning / Lori LaBarbera
2026-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dorothea Cheng
0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Lisa Ross / Christi Lin
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosemary Turner
0.067below expectation — took 32% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
Lan Duong / Carli Fettig
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Golden
+0.064better than expected — took 80% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Nick Snow / Morgan Daleymixed
2025-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirk Howser
+0.000better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 2-2
W
Sheri Feast / Karina McAffee
2025-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michaela Stevens
0.054below expectation — took 47% of games against 69% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.