Search

Jenny Penesa

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
296 matches · 155W–141L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.31
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
99%
down to 3.5
1%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 90% down · 10% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.40. Higher than today’s 3.31 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
129 of 129
NV · 4.0
201 of 203

Jenny is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jenny has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jenny has gone from the 54th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
55.2%
128W–104L · 53% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 43.5% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
18W–18L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 36.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history296 matches
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Chudd
0.001below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Nora Taylor / Aly Wagonseller
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth McManus
0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Peterson
0.007about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jennifer Gleason / Susan Norris
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Peterson
0.044below expectation — took 35% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with LOURDES MENDOZA
0.055below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Waters
0.017below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Karin de Amicis / Kelly Maier
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Grob
+0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rozanne Meservey
0.018below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Denise Antoniadis / Diane Welch
2026-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherill Herzfeld
+0.014better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Shannon Ashcraft / Anna Bishop
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hale
0.016below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Chloe Dilling / Jennifer Covington
2026-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toni Jackson
0.036below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.