Search

Jill Gragson

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
206 matches · 114W–92L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
24%
down to 3.5
76%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 14% down · 86% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.58. Higher than today’s 3.56 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
103 of 129
NV · 4.0
154 of 203

Jill is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jill has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jill has gone from the 51st to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
60.8%
90W–58L · 53.8% of games
4.5
20%
5W–20L · 41.2% of games
8.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history206 matches
L
Nora Taylor / Aly Wagonseller
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Theresa Melville
+0.009better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Cynthia Graham / Shani Ma
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marisela Cruz
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Cynthia Turner / Barbara Fair
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Lobato
0.020below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Wendy Jacobs / Ana Novicic
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Merwin
0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Marcy Saxe / Anna Bishop
2026-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Isaacs
+0.019better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Theresa Melville
+0.018better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Melville
+0.014about as expected — took 38% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Lobato
0.015below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Denise Mandelbaum / Lorry Mazzara
2026-03-02 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Merwin
0.046below expectation — took 62% of games against 74% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Rebecca Little / Jill Russell
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marisela Cruz
0.013below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Hayley Hollander / Nicole Lefebvre
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Melville
+0.052better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-09-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Lobato
+0.028better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.