← Search

Ana Novicic

LAS VEGAS, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
143 matches · 110W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
LAS VEGAS · 4.0
6 of 11
NV · 4.0
68 of 203

Ana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ana has been a steady 4.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Ana has gone from the 20th to the 94th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
77.4%
103W–30L · 59% of games
4.5
70%
7W–3L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jacobs
+0.025better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Cynthia Graham / Cynthia Turner
2026-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jacobs
+0.012better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jacobs
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Brynn Roberts / Samantha Schwartz
2026-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jacobs
−0.023below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Brandi Leedham-Erwin / Stephanie Ward
2026-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jacobs
+0.017better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-30 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jacobs
−0.044below expectation — took 56% of games against 70% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Amy Katz / Ashley Kildea
2026-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Pettet
+0.057better than expected — took 71% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Susan Castelli / Anahi Sanchez
2026-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary McNulty
−0.026below expectation — took 63% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Jamie Muaina / Rachel Calderon Young
2026-02-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Pettet
+0.050better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jacobs
+0.022better than expected — took 56% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Rebecca Little / Shawn McNulty
2026-02-02 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jacobs
+0.025better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Maryann Goodsell / Elizabeth Hansen
2025-12-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Jacobs
+0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.