← Search

Shani Ma

henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
465 matches · 238W–227L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 36 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
23%
down to 3.5
77%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 14% down · 86% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.59. Higher than today’s 3.56 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 4.0
150 of 203

Shani is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shani has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Shani has gone from the 17th to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level13 levels played
3.0
80.8%
42W–10L · 62.2% of games
3.5
68.3%
69W–32L · 59% of games
4.0
37.1%
59W–100L · 44.9% of games
4.5
0%
0W–8L · 30.3% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 48.1% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 59.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
17W–17L · 50.6% of games
7.5mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 45% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history465 matches
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Graham
−0.019below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Hong Lee / Tracey Lee
2026-07-23 · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Graham
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Teddy Stantcheva / Serena Roberts
2026-07-13 · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Gonzales
−0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Onidio Mirabal
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Serena Roberts / Nora Taylor
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Gleason
+0.045better than expected — took 56% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Mercedes Renteria IV / Shellene Goudgechamps
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · with Walter Sonntag
−0.006about as expected — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia Graham
−0.009below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benita Smiley
−0.019below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Walter Sonntag
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Dawn Soong / Claire Oraee
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Norris
+0.020better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Esther Tan / Sonia Vermeys
2026-04-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benita Smiley
−0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Billi Dunning
+0.059better than expected — took 29% of games against 15% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.