Search

Beverly Talaat

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
183 matches · 71W–112L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
18%
down to 3.5
82%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.60. Higher than today’s 3.57 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
97 of 129
NV · 4.0
144 of 203

Beverly is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Beverly has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Beverly has gone from the 66th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
43.3%
26W–34L · 46.7% of games
4.5
27%
17W–46L · 42.6% of games
8.0
57.1%
20W–15L · 55.3% of games
9.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history183 matches
L
Elisabeth Golden / Danielle Dyer
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rozanne Meservey
0.049below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcy Saxe
0.033below expectation — took 39% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Kelley Morgan / Theresa Melville
2026-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Perricone
0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Theresa Melville / Kelley Morgan
2026-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Perricone
0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
6-6
L
Maria Gonzales / Sonia Vermeys
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erin Anderson
+0.099better than expected — took 46% of games against 11% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Jenny Penesa / Amy Waters
2026-05-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hale
+0.017better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gayl Fitzgerald
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Cynthia Graham / Lorry Mazzara
2026-04-06 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Miller
0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
Shani Ma / Valerie Murphy
2026-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erin Anderson
+0.071better than expected — took 40% of games against 17% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Heather George / Sheri Grossberg
2026-03-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hale
+0.016about as expected — took 37% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chrys Smiley
+0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Reid
0.017below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.