← Search

Chrys Smiley

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
280 matches · 148W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chrys Smiley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history280 matches
W
2026-05-28 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anna Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · NV/Antoniadis/65&OverW8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Antoniadis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-28 · NV/Antoniadis/65&OverW8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nora Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-23 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Unglaub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-20 · DTC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcy Saxe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · DTC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-23 · DTC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beverly Talaat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · SPANISH TRAIL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debora Dean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-23 · DTC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-0
L
2026-01-26 · DTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beverly Talaat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-10 · SPANISH TRAIL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruby Marine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
61.8%
63W–39L · 55.1% of games
4.5
41.8%
38W–53L · 46.3% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
66%
33W–17L · 56.4% of games
9.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
76 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe