Search

Chrys Smiley

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
280 matches · 148W–132L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.59
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
12%
down to 3.5
88%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 8% down · 92% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.61. Higher than today’s 3.59 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
94 of 129
NV · 4.0
139 of 203

Chrys is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chrys has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Chrys has gone from the 48th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
61.8%
63W–39L · 55.1% of games
4.5
41.8%
38W–53L · 46.3% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
66%
33W–17L · 56.4% of games
9.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history280 matches
W
Sandra Zanella / Rosemary Turner
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anna Bishop
+0.004about as expected — took 54% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Annette Whiteside / Jane Hodges
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Antoniadis
+0.011better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Annette Whiteside / Joan Perricone
2026-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nora Taylor
0.001better than expected — took 80% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Danielle Dyer / Elisabeth Golden
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Unglaub
0.043below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Dawn Anderson / Lorraine Yarde
2026-04-20 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hale
+0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Serena Roberts / Sharon Jimenez
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcy Saxe
+0.035better than expected — took 53% of games against 38% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Billi Dunning / Lori LaBarbera
2026-04-13 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hale
+0.032better than expected — took 60% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beverly Talaat
+0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Ashley Marx / Jenniffer Rodriguez-Rivera
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debora Dean
+0.023better than expected — took 58% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Liz Jones / Shannon Ashcraft
2026-02-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hale
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 3-0
L
2026-01-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beverly Talaat
0.001below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruby Marine
0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.