← Search

Annette Whiteside

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 37W–138L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Annette Whiteside to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
L
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gayl Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Perricone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Alber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Nienhuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Kerby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Kerby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Kerby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-01-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Kerby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Giedt-Paredes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams136 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
48.5%
16W–17L · 49% of games
4.0
9%
7W–71L · 32.1% of games
7.0
31.6%
12W–26L · 41.9% of games
8.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 25.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 34% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
24 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams