Search

Bambi Montag

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
346 matches · 169W–177L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
52 of 73
NV · 3.5
169 of 228

Bambi is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Bambi has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Bambi has gone from the 7th to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
59.8%
73W–49L · 54% of games
3.5
35.8%
44W–79L · 44.9% of games
6.0
85%
17W–3L · 67.7% of games
7.0
41.2%
21W–30L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.7% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history346 matches
L
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fay Gallus
0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Lori LaBarbera / Teisha Hunsaker
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
+0.015about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Sabine Curtis / Claudia Hernandez
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fay Gallus
0.033below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Nienhuis
0.013below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luann Holmes
+0.036better than expected — took 65% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Anne Alba / Kelley Bailey
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chandra VanPaepeghem
+0.012better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Sabine Curtis / Karen Miller
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindi Ray
+0.023better than expected — took 40% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Debbie Hicks / Lorry Mazzara
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruby Leong
+0.007about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Katerina Selland / Hong Lee
2026-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindi Ray
+0.020better than expected — took 56% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Megan Bender / Christine LaBarre
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Schnabel
0.036below expectation — took 35% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Jen Tanner / Jamie Feller
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joni Kerby
+0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Annette Whiteside / Michelle Alber
2026-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Delgado
+0.052better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.