Search

Jamie Feller

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
110 matches · 48W–62L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.27
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
73 of 139
NV · 3.5
116 of 228

Jamie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jamie has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jamie has gone from the 68th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
54.3%
44W–37L · 51.8% of games
4.0
14.8%
4W–23L · 37.8% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history110 matches
L
Sunny Glendon / Mandy Hansen
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Desiree Maloney
0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Tanner
0.009about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Desiree Maloney
+0.019better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Sally Zimmerman / Hong Lee
2026-04-01 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Brown
0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carroll Welch
0.017below expectation — took 28% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Lyndsey van der Laan
2026-03-04 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Pettigrew
0.016below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carroll Welch
0.011below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Desiree Maloney
0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Tanner
+0.033better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Ashley Steffen / Britney Jensen
2025-12-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Pettigrew
+0.020about as expected — took 38% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Judith Watson / Tami Brandon
2025-10-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Pettigrew
+0.032better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Juli Kochanski / Cynthia Lau
2025-10-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Tanner
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.