Search

Gayl Fitzgerald

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
161 matches · 119W–42L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.62
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 3.5
93%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 5% down · 95% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.63. Higher than today’s 3.62 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
88 of 129
NV · 4.0
131 of 203

Gayl is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gayl has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Gayl has gone from the 88th to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
89.8%
44W–5L · 67.4% of games
4.0
69.1%
47W–21L · 58.8% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 36.1% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history161 matches
L
Cynthia Turner / Nora Taylor
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Davis
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Debbie Torbati / Joni Gurrola
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annette Whiteside
0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lan Duong
0.028below expectation — took 52% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beverly Talaat
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
0.038below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Dawn Soong / Tanya Hale
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lan Duong
0.017about as expected — took 63% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Grob
0.032about as expected — took 71% of games against 75% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Gabriela Resh / Cynthia Turner
2026-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
0.033below expectation — took 57% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lan Duong
0.025below expectation — took 60% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Amy Katz / Brittney Leavitt
2026-03-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
+0.085better than expected — took 86% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Rachel Lamb / Lindsay Stoddard
2026-02-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Jones
+0.113better than expected — took 80% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Rozanne Meservey / Stephanie Ward
2026-02-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lan Duong
+0.004about as expected — took 58% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.