← Search

Brittney Leavitt

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
122 matches · 92W–30L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.69
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.0
15 of 49
NV · 4.0
100 of 203

Brittney is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brittney has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Brittney has gone from the 73rd to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
78.9%
30W–8L · 65% of games
3.5
81.1%
43W–10L · 60.1% of games
4.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 55.5% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanie Wolfgramm
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Covington
+0.019better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanie Wolfgramm
−0.019below expectation — took 47% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanie Wolfgramm
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Anahi Sanchez / Gayl Fitzgerald
2026-03-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Katz
−0.085below expectation — took 14% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Valerie Murphy / Susan Norris
2026-02-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chloe Dilling
+0.086better than expected — took 92% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-26 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Rich
+0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Denise Antoniadis / Danielle Dyer
2025-12-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanie Wolfgramm
+0.019better than expected — took 55% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
Gina Case / Marchelle Locke
2025-12-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Roberts
−0.024below expectation — took 62% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-12-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Covington
+0.019better than expected — took 61% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Rebecca Little / Tanya Hale
2025-12-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Katz
+0.003better than expected — took 68% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-11-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Cerny
−0.044below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.