← Search

Gabriela Resh

Henderson, NV
4.0A year-end 2025
106 matches · 38W–68L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.37
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
95%
down to 3.5
5%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 75% down · 25% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.45. Higher than today’s 3.37 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.0
48 of 49
NV · 4.0
198 of 203

Gabriela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gabriela has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Gabriela has gone from the 33rd to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
4.0
35.8%
38W–68L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history106 matches
L
Mary McNulty / Katelyn McCullough
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Billi Dunning
+0.028about as expected — took 25% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Graham
+0.020better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Guenther
−0.030below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Guenther
+0.021better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Amanda Zommick / K C Scherrer
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jami Pappas
+0.019about as expected — took 35% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-04-13 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Fair
−0.072below expectation — took 25% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Danielle Dyer / Elisabeth Golden
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jami Pappas
−0.001about as expected — took 40% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Turner
−0.046below expectation — took 37% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Gayl Fitzgerald / Anahi Sanchez
2026-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Turner
+0.032better than expected — took 43% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Amy Pan / Debora Dean
2026-03-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Smallwood
−0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Christine Blake / Kristi Pishko
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Smallwood
+0.035better than expected — took 33% of games against 26% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Bing Zou / Dawn Anderson
2026-03-09 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Crovetti
−0.018below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.