Search

Jacqueline Smallwood

HENDERSON, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
186 matches · 89W–97L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
53%
stay 3.5
47%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 86% stay · 14% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.41. Lower than today’s 3.49 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
HENDERSON · 3.5
1 of 5
NV · 3.5
22 of 228

Jacqueline is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams76 teams · 2009–2026
DRAGONRIDGE CC #2
2026 Nta Ladies Spring Weekday League · 4.0 WOMEN
2026
DRAGONRIDGE CC
2026 Usta Adult League 18 & Over · 4.0 WOMEN- 18 & OVER
2026
ANTHEM CC
2025 Usta Adult League 55 & Over · 8.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER
2025
DRAGONRIDGE CC #2
2025 Nta Ladies Spring Weekday League · 4.0 WOMEN
2025
DRAGONRIDGE CC #2
2025 Nta Ladies Fall Weekday League · 4.0 WOMEN
2025
DRAGONRIDGE CC
2024 Usta Adult League 55 & Over · 8.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jacqueline has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jacqueline has gone from the 42nd to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
51%
79W–76L · 50.8% of games
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 39.1% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 48.4% of games
8.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history186 matches
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Billi Dunning
+0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Tracey Cutler / Susan Norris
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Turner
0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Billi Dunning
0.020below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Camilla Wells / Jessica Berger
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Gumm
+0.008about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Hansen / Charlene Rath
2026-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth-Ann Edwards
+0.055better than expected — took 75% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Lan Duong / Karen Watts
2026-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth-Ann Edwards
0.008about as expected — took 42% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Amy Pan / Debora Dean
2026-03-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriela Resh
0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Christine Blake / Kristi Pishko
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriela Resh
+0.035better than expected — took 33% of games against 26% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jenny Grob / Anahi Sanchez
2025-12-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Turner
0.013below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Turner
0.022below expectation — took 32% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Maryann Goodsell / Elizabeth Hansen
2025-11-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Turner
+0.022better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Guenther
+0.018about as expected — took 25% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.