← Search

Charlene Rath

Las Vegas, NV
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
269 matches · 118W–151L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Charlene Rath to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history269 matches
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyce Brownridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maryann Goodsell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maryann Goodsell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyce Brownridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maryann Goodsell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyce Brownridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-15 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darby Fitzpatrick-Reber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyce Brownridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2010–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
43.9%
118W–151L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
90 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
71 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams