← Search

Tracey Cutler

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
279 matches · 157W–122L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.50
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 61 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
50%
stay 3.5
50%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 85% stay · 15% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.42. Lower than today’s 3.50 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
17 of 139
NV · 3.5
19 of 228

Tracey is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tracey has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Tracey has gone from the 59th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
72%
18W–7L · 63.3% of games
3.5
62.9%
88W–52L · 54.2% of games
4.0
32.7%
18W–37L · 43.8% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.9% of games
7.0
90%
9W–1L · 64.6% of games
7.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
14W–4L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history279 matches
W
Tanya Hale / Nicole Reyes
2026-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jules Mitchell
+0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Singles
−0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Melanie Isbellchamps
2026-06-17 · #1 Singles
−0.009about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · #2 Singles
+0.040better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Shelby McIntyre
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 4.0
−0.030below expectation — took 42% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Perricone
+0.024better than expected — took 62% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katerina Selland
−0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Tricia Miller
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.020better than expected — took 42% of games against 36% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Brezya J Rhodes / Tyree Judd
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Francine Mazza
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Tanya Hale / Rebecca Little
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rose Gerrard
−0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Kara Godfrey / Enhua Chenmixed
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brennan Price
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Perricone
−0.028below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.