← Search

LOURDES MENDOZA

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
295 matches · 186W–109L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.58
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
15%
down to 3.5
85%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 10% down · 90% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.60. Higher than today’s 3.58 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
96 of 129
NV · 4.0
142 of 203

LOURDES is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

LOURDES has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, LOURDES has gone from the 28th to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level13 levels played
2.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 62.7% of games
3.0
84.6%
33W–6L · 66.8% of games
3.5
66.7%
38W–19L · 60.9% of games
4.0
50%
33W–33L · 50.2% of games
4.5
100%
4W–0L · 56.2% of games
7.0
100%
6W–0L · 64.2% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
53.1%
17W–15L · 54.5% of games
7.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 57.2% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history295 matches
L
Serena Roberts / Karin de Amicis
2026-07-27 · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hall
−0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Scott Baker / Seda Sargsyanmixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rod Faircloth
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Philip Tompkins
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Female Singles · 4.0
−0.003about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Michael Borenstein / Alexandra Wysongmixed
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rod Faircloth
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Jennifer Covington / Katie Jacobs
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carli Fettig
+0.030better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Ann Pham / Fiona Yeh
2026-07-06 · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Hong Lee
+0.001about as expected — took 42% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Singles
−0.012below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 4.0
−0.033below expectation — took 43% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
Andra Starr Scano / Joey Pecoraromixed
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Avino
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Penesa
−0.055below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Karin de Amicis / Jim Meserveymixed
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rogel Valles
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.