← Search

Russell Terao

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
220 matches · 85W–135L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.45
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
75%
stay 3.5
25%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.38. Lower than today’s 3.45 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
33 of 139
NV · 3.5
40 of 228

Russell is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Russell has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Russell has gone from the 43rd to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.5
36%
9W–16L · 49.2% of games
4.0
49.5%
46W–47L · 50.7% of games
4.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 45.7% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
23.8%
5W–16L · 43.8% of games
7.5mixed
29.2%
7W–17L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 46.1% of games
8.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history220 matches
L
Drew Saldana / Michaela Stevensmixed
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Gleason
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Michael Borenstein / Alexandra Wysongmixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Nhaisi
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
David Oraee / Randy Kondler
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Cunningham
+0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jackson Olsen / Myles Tiffany
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Onidio Mirabal
+0.044better than expected — took 33% of games against 23% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Sean Ono / Dan Hale
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brook Lee
+0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Earl Peralta / Brad Evans
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roger Martinez
−0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Oskar Dagys / Joel Willis
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Onidio Mirabal
−0.040below expectation — took 32% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
Tony Woo / Patrick ONeill
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raj Singh
+0.001about as expected — took 32% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Zimmerman
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Jim Meservey / Brian Sorrentino
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Onidio Mirabal
+0.086better than expected — took 71% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Kellen Cornett / Desiree Kathmannmixed
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Dexter
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Cj Park / Curtis Saludes
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Hill
−0.012about as expected — took 47% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.