Teams

LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1

2026 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 18 & OVER · 4.0 MEN- 18 & OVER

17 players · average NTRP 3.81 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-30vs WHITNEY MESA PARKLost 23
L#1 DoublesBrad Cunningham / Raj Singh vs Richard van Diepen / Daniel Lee3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesErick Sanchez vs Jose Guerrero2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Needham / Parminder Kang vs Brian Kolek / Eric Hansen6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRocco Santini vs Daniel Hsueh5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesErik Burn / James Hill vs YuCheng Chen / Maverick Yabut4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-16vs RED ROCK CC #3Won 32
W#1 DoublesOnidio Mirabal / Erik Burn vs David Holmes / Asad Nawaz6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMichael Janssen vs Jack Hogan4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRussell Terao / Brad Cunningham vs David Oraee / Randy Kondler4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesFrank Joyce vs Nathan Choi6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErick Sanchez / Raj Singh vs Randy Cox / Adam Neubauer6-4, 6-4
2026-05-09vs DTC #1Lost 13
L#1 DoublesErick Sanchez / Erik Burn vs Jason Glick / Brian Carroll3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRocco Santini vs Allan-Robert Peetsalu3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRussell Terao / Onidio Mirabal vs Jackson Olsen / Myles Tiffany2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMatthew Paglia vs Chris Sutton6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-02vs SPANISH OAKSLost 14
L#1 DoublesJames Hill / Erick Sanchez vs Tony Woo / Marcello Cardenas0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRocco Santini vs Domenico Pastia2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesParminder Kang / Onidio Mirabal vs Robert Hau / Jeff Girmus3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMichael Janssen vs David Velazquez Bazan6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDonnis Willis / Brad Cunningham vs Jeremy Christensen / Jimmy Jamie3-6, 4-6
2026-04-25vs RED ROCK CC #1Lost 05
L#1 DoublesDavid Needham / Parminder Kang vs Mike Little / Josiah Garlan4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRocco Santini vs Mike Burgoyne2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesErick Sanchez / Brad Cunningham vs Daigo Ishikawa / Albert Quimson3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesErik Burn vs Jason Tang1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Hill / Raj Singh vs Rajeev Sharma / Kandarp Bhatt5-7, 1-6
2026-04-18vs WHITNEY MESA PARKLost 05
L#1 DoublesParminder Kang / Raj Singh vs Richard van Diepen / Maverick Yabut4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesFrank Joyce vs David Truong2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErik Burn / Danny Siciliano vs Ben Ho / David Leibner3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Janssen vs Daniel Hsueh1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesOnidio Mirabal / Rocco Santini vs Patrick Stover / Luis Almanzar3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-04-11vs RED ROCK CC #3Won 41
W#1 DoublesFrank Joyce / Parminder Kang vs David Oraee / Randy Kondler3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMatthew Paglia vs Louis Lo6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErick Sanchez / James Hill vs Jack Hogan / Randy Cox2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesRocco Santini vs Nathan Choi6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErik Burn / Danny Siciliano vs David Holmes / Asad Nawaz6-4, 6-2
2026-03-28vs DTC #1Lost 14
L#1 DoublesParminder Kang / Raj Singh vs James Strasser / Allan-Robert Peetsalu3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Janssen vs Patrick Cronin2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesOnidio Mirabal / Erick Sanchez vs Myles Tiffany / Alan Mcgrath1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRocco Santini vs Brian Carroll7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDanny Siciliano / David Needham vs Carter Kessler / Allen Fleegle2-6, 2-6
2026-03-21vs SPANISH OAKSLost 05
L#1 DoublesParminder Kang / Tyler Klunick vs Cody Kennedy / Matt Stephenson3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesFrank Joyce vs Robert Hau6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRussell Terao / Raj Singh vs Tony Woo / Patrick ONeill0-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMatthew Paglia vs Joseph Walters3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDanny Siciliano / Erik Burn vs Stephen DeGuzman / Anthony Osibov3-6, 4-6
2026-03-14vs RED ROCK CC #1Lost 23
L#1 DoublesOnidio Mirabal / Donnis Willis vs Tim Mullin / Karl Robinson0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMichael Janssen vs Daigo Ishikawa7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesParminder Kang / Erik Burn vs Albert Quimson / Michael Delozier0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMatthew Paglia vs Rajeev Sharma2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrad Cunningham / Raj Singh vs Josiah J Garlan / Josiah Garlan4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN- 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Matthew Paglia
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.71
Michael Janssen
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.70
Rocco Santini
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4
3.68
Frank Joyce
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
David Needham
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Erik Burn
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Raj Singh
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.54
Danny Siciliano
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Donnis Willis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Parminder Kang
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.39
Erick Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.32
Brad Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Russell Terao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.20
Onidio Mirabal
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.15
Troy Fenn
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
James Hill
published
Tyler Klunick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Onidio Mirabal + Parminder Kang2442% games+2.1% vs expected
Parminder Kang + David Needham8850% games+1.7% vs expected
Onidio Mirabal + Russell Terao61346% games+1.7% vs expected
Raj Singh + Parminder Kang3646% games−1.8% vs expected
Donnis Willis + Onidio Mirabal1638% games−6.6% vs expected
Raj Singh + Brad Cunningham0535% games−7.8% vs expected
Raj Singh + Danny Siciliano2348% gamesnot enough data
Onidio Mirabal + Raj Singh134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Paglia
44W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Michael Janssen
43W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Rocco Santini
82W–87L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Frank Joyce
37W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
David Needham
51W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Erik Burn
23W–22L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Raj Singh
61W–103L career · 7 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Danny Siciliano
115W–57L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Donnis Willis
57W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Parminder Kang
116W–119L career · 8 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Erick Sanchez
106W–104L career · 7 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.39
3.5
Brad Cunningham
56W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Russell Terao
86W–136L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Onidio Mirabal
94W–209L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Troy Fenn
20W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
James Hill
1W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tyler Klunick
13W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.