Search

Danny Siciliano

Henderson, NV
4.0S year-end 2026
171 matches · 115W–56L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.62
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 3.5
93%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 5% down · 95% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.63. Higher than today’s 3.62 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.0
28 of 49
NV · 4.0
132 of 203

Danny is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Danny has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Danny has gone from the 63rd to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
79.5%
62W–16L · 64.5% of games
4.0
47.4%
18W–20L · 48.7% of games
6.5mixed
65%
13W–7L · 56.1% of games
7.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 59% of games
7.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 55% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-07-28 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Raj Singh
+0.028better than expected — took 48% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Bill Oakley / Michael Webb
2026-07-21 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Kellen Vermeys
0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Dan Michalski / James Mcclary
2026-07-07 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Roger Martinez
0.040below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Ben Ho / David Leibner
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erik Burn
+0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
David Holmes / Asad Nawaz
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erik Burn
+0.028better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Carter Kessler / Allen Fleegle
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Needham
0.044below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erik Burn
+0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Jason MacDonald / Adam Neubauer
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Needham
+0.034better than expected — took 72% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Marcus Berg / Matt Sinnock
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raj Singh
+0.010about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Parminder Kang
0.033below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Earl Peralta / Michael Holcomb
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donnis Willis
0.049below expectation — took 43% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Ken Kesick / Dan Michalski
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russell Terao
0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.