Search

Stephen DeGuzman

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
154 matches · 89W–65L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.62
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
6%
down to 3.5
94%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
85 of 129
NV · 4.0
125 of 203

Stephen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stephen has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Stephen has gone from the 25th to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
59%
62W–43L · 54.2% of games
4.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history154 matches
L
Michael Springer / Darin Hoesel
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruy Bautista
0.023below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Myles Tiffany / Alan Mcgrath
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Osibov
+0.038better than expected — took 56% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
David Leibner / Eric Hansen
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcello Cardenas
0.026below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Daigo Ishikawa / Rajeev Sharmachamps
2026-04-09 · #1 Doubles · with Marcello Cardenas
0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Eric Chun / Junghyun Yangchamps
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · with Mark Sylvain
0.009about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Danny Siciliano / Erik Burn
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Osibov
0.004about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Jeremie Moll / JP White
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruy Bautista
+0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Osibov
+0.016better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cody Kennedy
0.013below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Scott Baker / Ehsan Kaveh
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Hsueh
0.033below expectation — took 35% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Mike Little / Jason MacDonald
2025-12-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Domenico Pastia
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Ron Hofflander / Timothy Lee
2025-11-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jimmy Jamie
+0.013about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.