Search

Peter Goatz

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
139 matches · 70W–69L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.70
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
67 of 129
NV · 4.0
94 of 203

Peter is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Peter has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Peter has gone from the 35th to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
50.5%
56W–55L · 51.2% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 54.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history139 matches
W
Jasper Kim / Raj Singh
2026-07-21 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with T Paul Williams
0.021about as expected — took 63% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
David Blank / Brian Sorrentino
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kota Cook
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Tracey Lee / Michael de Amicismixed
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hayley Hollander
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Oakley
0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Caitlin Murphy / Enhua Chenmixed
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carli Fettig
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Oakley
0.080about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Daniel Dragnev / Mark Bernardo
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Gaston
+0.016better than expected — took 58% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jordan Bosnos / Aleksei Zilbermanmixed
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hayley Hollander
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Ron Hofflander / Jeff Ng
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Gaston
0.015below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Gaston
0.004about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Paige Song / Edward Songmixed
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hayley Hollander
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 75% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Daniel Fogg / Patrick Stover
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Oakley
+0.023better than expected — took 63% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.