← Search

Bill Oakley

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 83W–167L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bill Oakley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history250 matches
L
Ben Ho / Micah Tran
2026-08-11 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #1 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Sanford White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Brett Wachter / Robert Martin
2026-08-04 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #1 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Glick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #1 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amanda Parson Siegel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amanda Parson Siegel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amanda Parson Siegel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Goatz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amanda Parson Siegel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-04-25 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Goatz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-12 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amanda Parson Siegel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
30.4%
51W–117L · 44.6% of games
8.0
50%
5W–5L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
20%
3W–12L · 41.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.8% of games
8.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
40.5%
17W–25L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
67 matches
#3 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Male Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal