Teams

SGV LLW Wild Cards-Tang-Arroyo High /SA12

2026 Mixed Doubles - 40 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - 9.0 Mixed Division

23 players · average NTRP 4.52 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesEdgar Bove / Madeline Chang vs Brian Chen / Christine Chen6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesEugene Tran / Davina Hsu vs Mandi Collier / Dave Kang6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesDavina Hsu / Andrew Clayton vs Kristina Chen / Kevin Thoeng4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErica Smalley / Alexander Kantarelis vs Mandi Collier / Thomas Hoeg-Jensen6-2, 7-6
W#1 DoublesAndrea Kretzmann / Darren Wong vs Mandi Collier / Dave Kang6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlan Siu / Erica Smalley vs Gloria Geller / Brian Chen6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmanda Richardson / Eugene Tran vs Mandi Collier / Dave Kang4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAlexander Kantarelis / Heidi Schuler vs Kristina Chen / Kevin Thoeng6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Hansen / Ghia Godfree vs Kit Church / VICKY TRINH7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Kanemoto / TRAM LY vs Dave Kang / Mandi Collier0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesAnja Clarke / Daniel Kanemoto vs Kit Church / Hairong Cusack6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrew Clayton / Madeline Chang vs Cynthia Garcia / Thomas Hoeg-Jensen6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Kretzmann / Alan Siu vs Dave Kang / Jinna Johnson7-5, 6-1
W#1 DoublesMadeline Chang / Eugene Tran vs Brian Chen / Michele Mouttapa6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesYuri Nichelson / Alan Siu vs Jay Ho / Hairong Cusack6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGhia Godfree / Matt Hansen vs Mandi Collier / Thomas Hoeg-Jensen6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - 9.0 Mixed Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Anja Clarke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.91
Amanda Parson Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.74
Andrew Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.70
Mandi Collier
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.58
Andrea Kretzmann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.55
Eugene Tran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.53
Edgar Bove
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.49
Erica Smalley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.44
Yuri Nichelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
TRAM LY
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.36
Alexander Kantarelis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
April Hartstein
published 4.5
4.27
Colin Tang
published 4
4.25
Ghia Godfree
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Heidi Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Alan Siu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.89
Darren Wong
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Daniel Kanemoto
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Amanda Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Madeline Chang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Davina Hsu
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.67
Bill Oakley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Matt Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Parson Siegel + Bill Oakley6063% gamesnot enough data
Ghia Godfree + Matt Hansen404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anja Clarke
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.93
5
Amanda Parson Siegel
33W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.91
5
Andrew Clayton
4W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.74
5
Mandi Collier
188W–89L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.70
4.5
Andrea Kretzmann
33W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.58
5
Eugene Tran
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
4.55
5
Edgar Bove
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.53
4.5
Erica Smalley
109W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
4.49
4.5
Yuri Nichelson
207W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
5
TRAM LY
139W–109L career · 2 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
4.37
4.5
Alexander Kantarelis
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
April Hartstein
227W–139L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4
Colin Tang
17W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
4.27
4.5
Ghia Godfree
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
4.25
4.5
Heidi Schuler
117W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Alan Siu
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Darren Wong
18W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Daniel Kanemoto
23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Amanda Richardson
30W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
Madeline Chang
27W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Davina Hsu
11W–6L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Bill Oakley
83W–167L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Matt Hansen
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.