← Search

Sanford White

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2024
94 matches · 26W–68L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Sanford sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Sanford is one of 1278 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 60% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sanford has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sanford has gone from the 1st to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
30.1%
25W–58L · 42.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history94 matches
L
Aaron Schnitz / Daniel Dragnev
2024-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Ramos
−0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Chris Lexis / Domenico Pastia
2024-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Berg
+0.010about as expected — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Markus Gonsalveschamps
2024-04-10 · #1 Singles
−0.042below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Michael Gleason / Sanjiv Pandeychamps
2024-04-09 · #2 Doubles · with Abraham Taylor
+0.026better than expected — took 47% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
Chad Alligood / Tony Trexler
2024-02-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Bosnos
+0.018better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-01-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wael Eid
+0.077better than expected — took 71% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Mauricio Vejar / Robert Bloom
2024-01-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Bosnos
+0.032better than expected — took 57% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Damon Balfour / Ron Arguellochamps
2023-08-12 · #1 Doubles · with Jason Glick
−0.042below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Daniel George / Brent Barberchamps
2023-08-11 · #3 Doubles · with Jason Glick
−0.044below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Andre E Kohler / LEIF TAPANILAchamps
2023-08-11 · #3 Doubles · with Erich Moxley
−0.028below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Timothy Tuong / John Tochamps
2023-06-14 · #2 Doubles · with Benjamin Kott
−0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Sathi Dispanurat / Eric Chunchamps
2023-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Adam Austin
+0.025about as expected — took 29% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.