← Search

Chad Alligood

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
155 matches · 74W–81L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
21%
stay 3.5
79%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 67% stay · 33% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.47. Lower than today’s 3.56 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
10 of 139
NV · 3.5
10 of 228

Chad is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chad has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Chad has gone from the 45th to the 13th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 56.1% of games
4.0
36.8%
21W–36L · 47.4% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
18W–9L · 57.1% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.1% of games
8.0mixed
7.1%
1W–13L · 31.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history155 matches
W
Neil LeBlanc / Brad Scheevel
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allan-Robert Peetsalu
+0.089better than expected — took 86% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Andrew Lenssen / David Delange
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alan Mcgrath
+0.070better than expected — took 71% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Tori Penick / Jeffrey Penickmixed
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Olson
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Daniel Frink / Michael Seelinger
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Benakos
+0.007about as expected — took 60% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Shervin Badamchi / Daniel Ryan
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerome van Amburg
+0.014better than expected — took 63% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
David Livingston / Chris Anthes
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Palma
+0.018better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
N/Amixed
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kate Alred
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 89% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carter Kessler
+0.003about as expected — took 35% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Dena Deluca / Kent Wattsmixed
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Morgan Daley
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
Carlos Aguirre / Jeremy Christensen
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Roeben
−0.042below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Carter Kessler / Nicole Palichatmixed
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexandra Wysong
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Andrew Chong / Dmitriy Kosyagin
2026-02-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Worrall
+0.008about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.