Search

Matt Sinnock

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
175 matches · 81W–94L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.54
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
30%
down to 3.5
70%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 18% down · 82% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.57. Higher than today’s 3.54 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.0
33 of 49
NV · 4.0
157 of 203

Matt is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matt has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Matt has gone from the 50th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
49.1%
57W–59L · 51.7% of games
4.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 43.4% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.1% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 52% of games
8.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 45.2% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history175 matches
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Schinabeck
0.019below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Kellen Vermeys / Michael Gleason
2026-07-07 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Berg
0.081below expectation — took 25% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Candy Rosenberg
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Kesick
+0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Daniel Dragnev / Jennifer Cribbmixed
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Candy Rosenberg
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Aaron Schnitz / Michael Borenstein
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Kott
0.010below expectation — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Ava Nhaisi / Gary Roebenmixed
2026-03-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andra Starr Scano
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Tyler Gaston / Kota Cook
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Bosnos
0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Danny Siciliano / Raj Singh
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Berg
0.009about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Kott
+0.024better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Michael Janssen
2026-01-24 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.070below expectation — took 8% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.