← Search

Matt Sinnock

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 81W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Matt Sinnock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
L
2026-07-21 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Schinabeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Kellen Vermeys / Michael Gleason
2026-07-07 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Candy Rosenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Kesick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-26 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Candy Rosenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-18 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Kott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-25 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andra Starr Scano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Bosnos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-28 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Kott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
48.3%
58W–62L · 51.5% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.1% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.1% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 52% of games
8.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 45.2% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
39 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams