Search

Michael Dinielli

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2024
112 matches · 60W–52L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
80 of 129
NV · 4.0
112 of 203

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Michael has gone from the 84th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
65%
52W–28L · 54.1% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 37.4% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history112 matches
L
Patrick Stover / Mike Noble
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Rodrigues
0.025below expectation — took 40% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Anthony Ng / Derek Barraclough
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Rodrigues
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Martin Mitchell / Matt Rowley
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Rodrigues
0.040below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Malinowski
0.024below expectation — took 38% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Onidio Mirabal / James Hill
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Thomas
0.003about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Mark Richards / Steve Hayden
2024-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Lu
0.049below expectation — took 37% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jason Schieck / Tim Mullin
2024-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Newman
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Matt Sinnock / Steve Hayden
2024-03-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Goatz
0.022below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-12-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Goatz
0.009about as expected — took 54% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Daigo Ishikawa / Jason MacDonald
2023-12-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wade Richardson
0.061below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Daniel Dragnev / Jeff Rue
2023-11-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Treasure Nyame
+0.034better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Mike Burgoyne / Steven Carron
2023-10-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Oakley
+0.026better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.