Search

Patrick Stover

year-end
168 matches · 82W–86L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Patrick Stover to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-06-07 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Larry Malinowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-10 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Noble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Noble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Larry Malinowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard van Diepen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Noble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-18 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luis Almanzar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Silbey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-22 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Fogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-07 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Fogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-07 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Fogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-01-10 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivan Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 38.4% of games
3.5
65.5%
36W–19L · 57.5% of games
4.0
39.5%
32W–49L · 44.9% of games
8.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.5% of games
6.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 69.9% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 15.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova