Search

Tony Woo

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
49 matches · 35W–14L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.77
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
40 of 138
NV · 4.0
59 of 214

Tony is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tony has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52021202220252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Tony has gone from the 80th to the 79th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
83.9%
26W–5L · 57.9% of games
4.5
50%
6W–6L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
W
Asad Nawaz / Randy Cox
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Barraclough
+0.010better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
James Hill / Erick Sanchez
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcello Cardenas
+0.066better than expected — took 92% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Stephenson
0.013below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Darin Hoesel / Michael Springer
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Girmus
0.005about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Kirk Howser / Karl Robinsonchamps
2026-04-09 · #3 Doubles · with Patrick ONeill
0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Daniel Fogg / Patrick Stoverchamps
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · with Patrick ONeill
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Scott Baker / Michael Borensteinchamps
2026-04-06 · #2 Doubles · with Matt Stephenson
0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Russell Terao / Raj Singh
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick ONeill
+0.007better than expected — took 68% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Hau
0.008below expectation — took 45% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
Musashi Okada / Cody Linchamps
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · with Jason Schieck
0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Philip Luna / Richard van Diepen
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Osibov
0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Jeremie Moll / Carter Kessler
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Hsueh
0.032below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.