Search

Rod Allison

Las Vegas, NV
3.5A year-end 2025
70 matches · 31W–39L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
11%
stay 3.5
89%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 55% stay · 45% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.49. Lower than today’s 3.60 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
4 of 139
NV · 3.5
4 of 228

Rod is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rod has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Rod has gone from the 10th to the 37th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 52.6% of games
4.0
37.5%
12W–20L · 45.7% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.2% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.6% of games
8.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Fogg
+0.022better than expected — took 43% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Fogg
0.040below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Dmitriy Kosyagin / Andrew Chong
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Fogg
+0.031better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Bryan Kyle / Carlos Hinojosa
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Fogg
+0.011better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Jim Ray / Sonny Ho
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Noble
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Larry Tombari / Andrew Chong
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Noble
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
John Rodrigues / Brent Muir
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raul Martinez
0.023below expectation — took 32% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Jeremy Christensen / Jeff Ng
2025-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dmitriy Kosyagin
0.009about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Allen Fleegle / Gerardo Perez
2025-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dmitriy Kosyagin
+0.016better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Justin Seria / Phil Pham
2025-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dmitriy Kosyagin
+0.016better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Brett Wachter / Austin Petit
2025-04-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dmitriy Kosyagin
0.003about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Andrew Volin / Kent Watts
2025-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Phillips
+0.034better than expected — took 60% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.