Search

Justin Seria

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
91 matches · 49W–42L · seasons 20192025
Where Justin sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Justin is one of 856 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Justin has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Justin has gone from the 38th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.9% of games
4.0
41.5%
27W–38L · 48.1% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history91 matches
L
Raj Singh / William Ferrence
2025-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Mikhael Co
0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Allen Fleegle / Gerardo Perez
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sathi Dispanurat
+0.006about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Austin Petit / Andy Fouche
2025-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Ly
+0.015about as expected — took 35% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phil Pham
0.016below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-04-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phil Pham
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Abraham Taylor / Samuel McIlvain
2025-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Ly
0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Ly
0.048about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Christopher Madsen / Jeremy Madsen
2025-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Mikhael Co
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Patrick Stover / Eric Chun
2024-12-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sathi Dispanurat
+0.023better than expected — took 58% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Karl Robinson / Chris Stimson
2024-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sathi Dispanurat
+0.023about as expected — took 29% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Yokogawa
+0.013about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Chris Boron / Matthew Phillips
2024-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Ly
0.066below expectation — took 29% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.