Search

Jeremy Madsen

North Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
191 matches · 120W–71L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
24%
down to 3.5
76%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 14% down · 86% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.59. Higher than today’s 3.56 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
North Las Vegas · 4.0
5 of 6
NV · 4.0
153 of 203

Jeremy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeremy has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jeremy has gone from the 63rd to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
75.9%
60W–19L · 60.3% of games
4.0
55.2%
58W–47L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history191 matches
L
Robert Carlson / Brook Lee
2026-07-28 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Madsen
0.039below expectation — took 43% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Matt Sinnock / Thomas Schinabeck
2026-07-21 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Fouche
+0.019better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Madsen
0.017below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Jeff Ng / Anthony Ng
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Madsen
0.013below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Aleksei Zilberman
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.059better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Michael Borenstein / Marco Borremans
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Madsen
+0.024better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Sherer
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Madsen
0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Madsen
0.024better than expected — took 100% of games against 92% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Nick Arriola
2026-03-21 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.011about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Jim Meservey / Wade Richardson
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with COLE BOREN
0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Derek Barraclough / Matt Stephenson
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Madsen
0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.