Search

Andrew Sherer

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
250 matches · 163W–87L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.71
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
62 of 129
NV · 4.0
87 of 203

Andrew is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrew has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Andrew has gone from the 73rd to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.4% of games
3.5
67.9%
38W–18L · 58.1% of games
4.0
60.8%
62W–40L · 53.9% of games
4.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.5% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80.6%
25W–6L · 59.9% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history250 matches
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Male Singles · 4.0
0.052below expectation — took 50% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
James Mcclary / Blair McPhail
2026-07-21 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Martin
0.031below expectation — took 57% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Luis Almanzar
2026-07-14 · #1 Male Singles · 4.0
0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Allen Morgan / David Morgan
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Wachter
+0.009about as expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Fouche
0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Ramona Acosta / Jack Stevensmixed
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leticia Schoff
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Wachter
0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Kota Cook / Matthew Phillips
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Martin
0.028below expectation — took 47% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Chantel Vu / Tam Vumixed
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jenny Mulopulos
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Madsen
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leticia Schoff
+0.000below expectation — took 67% of games against 85% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Junghyun Yang / James Mcclary
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Martin
+0.001about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.