← Search

Brent Muir

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
246 matches · 181W–65L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
3%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.81. Lower than today’s 3.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
18 of 129
NV · 4.0
26 of 203

Brent is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brent has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Brent has gone from the 32nd to the 63rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 71.7% of games
4.0
56.4%
44W–34L · 53.3% of games
4.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.9% of games
7.0
83.3%
40W–8L · 62.5% of games
8.0
86.2%
25W–4L · 62.7% of games
6.5mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.2% of games
7.0mixed
92%
23W–2L · 62.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history246 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Dendy
−0.056about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Raul Martinez / Rod Allison
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Rodrigues
+0.023better than expected — took 68% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonny Ho
−0.016below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Jose Morales / Melby Febuschamps
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · with Sheri Cherubino
+0.013better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Eric Zhong / Jennifer Dochamps
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · with Melissa Ruediger
−0.012below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
James Piao / Pam Freedchamps
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · with Sheri Cherubino
+0.022better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Clint Tomlinson / JANET van MOLchamps
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · with Melissa Ruediger
+0.027better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Christopher Silversmith / James Mcclary
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Stevens
+0.007better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Jose Prado / Michel Umphreychamps
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · with Sheri Cherubino
+0.026better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Nils Kenaston / Susan Learychamps
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · with Melissa Ruediger
+0.005about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Michael Springer / Darin Hoesel
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Rodrigues
−0.040below expectation — took 40% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Rajeev Sharma / Adam Neubauer
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Rodrigues
−0.045below expectation — took 43% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.