Search

Stacia Walker

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
131 matches · 69W–62L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.92
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
83%
stay 4.0
17%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.86. Lower than today’s 3.92 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
10 of 129
NV · 4.0
13 of 203

Stacia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stacia has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Stacia has gone from the 97th to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 63.3% of games
4.5
45.3%
24W–29L · 46.3% of games
5.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
58.1%
18W–13L · 50.9% of games
8.5mixed
10%
1W–9L · 40.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history131 matches
L
Christine DeLisle / Mike Fitzpatrickmixed
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zack Messer
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zack Messer
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda
+0.037better than expected — took 58% of games against 40% expected
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Christine Blake / Heather Morgansonchamps
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda
+0.016better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Tricia Miller / Annie Guilianochamps
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda
0.018below expectation — took 52% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirk Howser
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Andra Starr Scano / Diane Welch
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brynn Roberts
+0.041better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Josephine McPeak / Anahi Sanchez
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Cribb
0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Audrey Chin / Andre Chengmixed
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shane Littlefield
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Michael Borenstein / Jennifer Cribbmixed
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shane Littlefield
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Jennifer Cribb / Michael Borensteinmixed
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shane Littlefield
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Andra Starr Scano / James Thomasmixed
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shane Littlefield
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 92% expected
6-0, 4-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.