← Search

Stacia Walker

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 71W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stacia Walker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-08-10 · DTC · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Farley Messer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-09 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tom Gosnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · DTC · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Ashcraft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zack Messer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zack Messer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirk Howser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · DTC #4 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brynn Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · DTC #4 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Cribb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shane Littlefield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
87.5%
21W–3L · 63.7% of games
4.5
45.3%
24W–29L · 46.3% of games
5.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
58.1%
18W–13L · 50.9% of games
8.5mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 40.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
27 matches
#1 Singles
13%
18 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert