← Search

CHRISTINE McNair

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 62W–69L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add CHRISTINE McNair to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-09-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Casey Primmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Casey Primmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with ANN MARIE WEAVER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with ANN MARIE WEAVER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirsten Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chandra VanPaepeghem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirsten Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
2.5
26.3%
5W–14L · 43.3% of games
3.0
55%
22W–18L · 53.8% of games
3.5
37%
10W–17L · 45.3% of games
6.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 69.9% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal