← Search

Amy Arbeli

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
133 matches · 70W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.91
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
86%
stay 3.0
14%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.85. Lower than today’s 2.91 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
70 of 134
NV · 3.0
89 of 166

Amy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amy has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Amy has gone from the 46th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
69.6%
55W–24L · 58.4% of games
3.5
28%
14W–36L · 40.6% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history133 matches
W
2026-07-23 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Krislyn Millar
+0.007about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeralyn Marchesi
+0.009about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Shaza Nayef / Melissa Arcella
2026-07-18 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Priscilla Gaughan
−0.043below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Stephanie Stern
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.001about as expected — took 55% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Smith
−0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Megan Bender / Luanne Balelo
2026-04-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krislyn Millar
−0.006about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Anna Clark
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.005about as expected — took 62% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Kayleen Krahenbuhl / Michelle Alber
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Brown
−0.023below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Kellie Woods / Kim Knottschamps
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · with Deborah Yamane
+0.006about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Joan Perricone / Jan Willis
2026-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Yamane
−0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.