Search

Casey Primmer

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
106 matches · 78W–28L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 2% stay · 98% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.16. Lower than today’s 3.33 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
1 of 22
NV · 3.0
1 of 166

Casey is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Casey has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Casey has gone from the 56th to the 77th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
87%
20W–3L · 59.8% of games
3.0
74.1%
40W–14L · 58.3% of games
3.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.2% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history106 matches
W
Jeralyn Marchesi / Candace Sartini
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with ANN MARIE WEAVER
+0.012better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Terri Keener / Hong Lee
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Waltman
0.011about as expected — took 59% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-13 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with ANN MARIE WEAVER
+0.018better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Lorry Mazzara / Sheri Harper
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Anderson
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with ANN MARIE WEAVER
+0.020better than expected — took 61% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Kinsey Wolanski / Raedene Counts
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ziebarth
0.015about as expected — took 59% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Melissa Kwong-Blais / Karen Watts
2026-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Anderson
+0.005about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with ANN MARIE WEAVER
+0.003about as expected — took 58% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Shanna Toft / Mary Lind
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Waltman
+0.026better than expected — took 37% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Margaret Bruno / Daniella Toms
2026-04-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with ANN MARIE WEAVER
+0.034better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · with ANN MARIE WEAVER
+0.020better than expected — took 54% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Kristyl Addison / Ara Lee Stimsonchamps
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · with Gina Rivera
+0.011better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.