← Search

Juliann Schnabel

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
199 matches · 58W–141L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.10
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
10%
stay 3.0
90%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 53% stay · 47% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.99. Lower than today’s 3.10 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
26 of 134
NV · 3.0
32 of 166

Juliann is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Juliann has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Juliann has gone from the 28th to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
28.7%
52W–129L · 42% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 30.2% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 66% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history199 matches
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Casey Primmer
2026-05-13 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Rowles
−0.018below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-06 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
+0.035better than expected — took 100% of games against 70% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Rowles
−0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Lau
−0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Rowles
−0.015below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Davis
+0.017better than expected — took 92% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Rowles
−0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Terry Powers / Minette Curnutt
2026-02-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Rowles
+0.038better than expected — took 48% of games against 34% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Hodges
+0.012better than expected — took 48% of games against 42% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Nienhuis
−0.016below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-12-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Bruno
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Nichole Averett / Chelsea Gray
2025-11-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Hawkes
−0.004below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.