← Search

Juliann Schnabel

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 58W–141L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Juliann Schnabel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history199 matches
L
2026-05-13 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Rowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-06 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-12 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Rowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-11 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Lau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-06 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Rowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-05 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-12 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Rowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-05 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Rowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-29 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-15 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Nienhuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-12-03 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Bruno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-05 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Hawkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
28.7%
52W–129L · 42% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 30.2% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 66% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
73 matches
#4 Doubles
21%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer