Search

Linda Hawkes

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
198 matches · 81W–117L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
6%
stay 3.0
94%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 45% stay · 55% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.01. Lower than today’s 3.12 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
5 of 22
NV · 3.0
25 of 166

Linda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Linda has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 2 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Linda has gone from the 30th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
40%
70W–105L · 45.8% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 47.9% of games
6.0
50%
7W–7L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history198 matches
W
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kay Patel
+0.025better than expected — took 56% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Shank
0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Larson
+0.024about as expected — took 20% of games against 22% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-08 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Shank
0.023below expectation — took 42% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-03-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorry Mazzara
+0.002about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Cappi Bates / Debbie D'Amato
2026-02-18 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kay Patel
0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-12-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Rivera
+0.017better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Karen Kiyono / Susan Gray
2025-12-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Colbert
0.030below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Wendy Sadler / Michelle Wells
2025-11-12 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Romney
+0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Nichole Averett / Chelsea Gray
2025-11-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliann Schnabel
0.004below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Larson
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-10-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Romney
+0.023about as expected — took 33% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.