← Search

Stephanie Romney

SANTA CLARA, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
252 matches · 81W–171L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Romney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history252 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Janet Lightheart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Becky Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Teresa Hatch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Suzanne Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Drabicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Drabicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-12 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Hawkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Hawkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Bruno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Nancy Hong / Kathy Breth
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · with Linda Hawkes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-10 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jayme Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jayme Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams123 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
35.8%
59W–106L · 44.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–27L · 28.6% of games
6.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 54.5% of games
7.0
35%
14W–26L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
59 matches
#4 Doubles
19%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
31 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert