Search

Stephanie Romney

SANTA CLARA, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
251 matches · 81W–170L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.74
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Teams123 teams · 2001–2026
10 Ace US
2026 Usta Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 W
2026
Coral Legends
2026 Usta Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 W
2026
DRAGONRIDGE CC
2025 Usta Adult League 55 & Over · 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER
2025
DRAGONRIDGE CC #3
2025 Nta Ladies Fall Weekday League · 3.5 WOMEN
2025
NV/MORLEY/ADULT55&OVER/W6.0
2025 Usta Adult League 55 & Over · 6.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER
2025
DRAGONRIDGE CC #2
2025 Nta Ladies Spring Weekday League · 3.5 WOMEN
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stephanie has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Stephanie has gone from the 25th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
35.8%
59W–106L · 44.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–27L · 28.6% of games
6.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 54.5% of games
7.0
35%
14W–26L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history251 matches
L
Dione Russell / Cara Garner
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Becky Nelson
0.036below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Kim Speakman / Diane Muse
2026-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Teresa Hatch
0.046below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Diane Muse / Carolyn Schramm
2026-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Suzanne Jensen
0.015below expectation — took 42% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Kim Speakman / Jill Russell
2026-02-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Drabicki
+0.034better than expected — took 33% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Dione Russell / Lisa Bledsoe
2026-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Drabicki
0.022below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Wendy Sadler / Michelle Wells
2025-11-12 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Hawkes
+0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Hawkes
+0.023about as expected — took 33% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Erin Anderson / Tanya Hale
2025-10-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Bruno
0.065below expectation — took 14% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Nancy Hong / Kathy Brethchamps
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · with Linda Hawkes
0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Darlene Whittlesy / ANN MARIE WEAVER
2025-09-10 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jayme Phillips
0.020below expectation — took 35% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jayme Phillips
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Jennifer Petrie / Joan Stertzer
2025-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristi Crawford
0.006about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.