← Search

Pilar Ahlstrom

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
144 matches · 79W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
86 of 139
NV · 3.5
137 of 228

Pilar is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pilar has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Pilar has gone from the 77th to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
57.1%
60W–45L · 54% of games
4.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 41.8% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history144 matches
L
Jessica Borghoff / Abigail Cox
2026-04-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Hughes
−0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Brezya J Rhodes / Marlaina Harris
2026-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
+0.044better than expected — took 48% of games against 32% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Hughes
−0.003about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
−0.044below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
−0.002about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
−0.017about as expected — took 60% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Katerina Selland / Hong Lee
2026-02-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
+0.040better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Cindi Ray / Juli Kochanski
2026-02-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Lamb
−0.037below expectation — took 60% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Song
+0.027better than expected — took 43% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-01-28 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Hughes
+0.061better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
+0.021better than expected — took 45% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Kayla Cervantes / Kristi Reilly
2025-10-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Hughes
−0.023below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.